A recent statewide survey proves that most victims question the benefits of imprisoning more criminals and prefer rehabilitation, education and Gov. Jerry Brown’s Realignment program. 500 participants were randomly selected, the survey was conducted by David Binder Research for Californians for Safety and Justice, April 2013.
The Results:
50% of the victims said California should focus more on supervised probation and rehabilitation for convicted criminals, compared with 23% who wanted more focus on sending them to jail or prison.
Victims also favored spending more on mental health and drug and alcohol treatment over spending more imprisonment, by 74% to 10%.
Nearly 80% said the state should invest more money in education as opposed to spending more on prisons.
36% said California sends too many people to prison and 33% said it sends too few, a difference that was within the poll’s margin of error, which was 4.4% percentage points.
38% of the victims said prison trains inmates to be better criminals and only 15% said prison rehabilitates inmates, with the rest saying it has no impact or expressing other views.
On realignment, Brown’s legislatively approved program of reducing the state prison population by sentencing lower-level felons to county jails instead of prison, 65% percent of the victims were in support, compared to 69% of the general population in a statewide survey conducted last November.
1/5 of California adults report being a victim of crime in the past five years, and half of the crimes were violent.
2/3 of victims reported suffering stress, anxiety, and other psychological problems, which typically lasted six month or longer.
36% of crime victims said the state sends too many people to prison and 33% said it sends too few.
50% of the victims said the state should focus more on supervised probation and rehabilitation for convicted criminals, while 23% said the state should focus more on sending them to jail or prison.
65% of the victims favored realignment, Gov. Jerry Brown’s program of sending low-level felons to county jails of state prison, while 24% opposed it.
The information gathered contradicts the public position of the most visible victims’ groups, which have campaigned for longer sentences and opposed rollbacks of the states’s three strikes law. Harriet Salarno, chairwoman of Crime Victims United disputed the survey by putting a stand for public safety first “Simply because they have the money to bundle their report in a nice pretty package does not mean it is a true representation of how victims feel.” Dionne Wilson of Morgan Hill one of the members of Anderson’s organization also expressed her committed belief in the lock-‘em-up approach until one night in July 2005, when one of her friends came to her door and said her husband, Dan Niemi, a San Leandro police officer, had been shot and killed. Irving Ramirez was later convicted of the murder and sentenced to death.
This past week Wilson expressed her view “I thought the trial and conviction would bring me peace. It didn’t. I came to see the criminal justice system in a new light. It spends most of its resources on punishment and isn’t making us any safer.”
The survey also concluded that 1 in 5 Californians has been a victim of crime in the past five years. Half of those have been violent crimes, whose victims are more likely to be young, low income and African American or Latino the report said.
The survey as well found disparities in victim’s willingness to report crimes to the police:
- 84 % reported burglaries
- 65% reported vandalism
- 65% reported assaults
- 50% reported rapes
- 39% reported stalking
Victims expressed that the main reasons they did not take action in reporting crimes was partly because of the time and effort required and the “lack of faith that anything will happen”. Many of the victims as well were unaware of most state-funded services available to them for assistance in applying for compensation from a victims’ fund in seeking counseling and in navigating the criminal justice system.
Posted on Vahe GTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales is really tough attorney and strong man. He never afraid of difficult cases and always fights like a knight. If you have some trouble in California, Mr. Morales' law firm really can help you.Posted on Jessy ATrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Chris Morales was very professional and kind. He made sure I understood every step and always took the time to answer my questions. I really appreciated his honesty and calm approach. I’m truly grateful for his help and would recommend him without hesitation.Posted on Jasmine STrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I really appreciate Christopher Morales for his professionalism and for taking the time to fully explain the answers to my questions. There's a lot that can be answered through his website, which I appreciate as well.Posted on Nazera FTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales is a very eloquent speaker with a great knowledge of the law and related matters. After I asked a few questions, he was able to answer them clearly and I felt supported by someone who had expertise in this field. I feel that he is passionate about his work and leads with that when representing his clients. I highly recommend getting in touch with him if you have questions or need support regarding criminal law.Posted on Shawn STrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I've had some interaction with Mr. Morales directly as I was doing research on his law firm and him specifically. He took the time to answer my questions thoughtfully and with candor. I was left with a very strong impression about his skills as an attorney and how he can best help his clients. I also asked a couple of indirect questions to get a sense of his views on law, policy, and society and was impressed with his answers and was left with a highly favorable view of the man. I would definitely be considering him and his firm for services that I need.Posted on Yen NTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales is highly professional, friendly, and takes time to answer questions patiently.Posted on Rebekah sTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales was prompt and informative with answering my questions. He gave me detailed information and left it open to ask more if needed.Posted on RenatoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Christopher Morales' most valuable trait is his straightforward honesty. He doesn't just tell you what you want to hear. Instead, he provides with a realistic legal perspective grounded in deep knowledge, ensuring you are well informed. I was also impressed how his firm leverages modern technology which makes the entire legal process more efficient, thus more affordable. For anyone needing a highly competent, modern, and direct attorney, I strongly recommend Christopher Morales.Posted on Claire MTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr Morales shows a great level of professionalism in his conversations and is approachable in personality. He was able to answer any questions I had and it was great to see his experience and knowledge reflected in the law firm website. I'm glad to have learned about his services.Posted on Karl bTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales was very knowledgeable and has answered all of my questions. Additionally, the website was full of very important information. I will be saving this website for future use. I am glad to have a place where I can run to if ever I need guidance with the law.