A Miranda Warning:
Miranda Warning: “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you. Do you understand the rights I have just read to you? With these rights in mind, do you wish to speak to me?”
What is a Miranda Warning?
When a police officer makes an arrest they usually interrogate the arrestee. They are usually trying to strengthen the prosecution’s case by getting the arrestee to provide some evidence of guilt. By answering questions after an arrest one gives up two rights granted by the U.S. Constitution.
– The fifth Amendment right to remain silent
– The sixth Amendment right to have a lawyer present during the questioning
The information obtained by police officers through questioning of a suspect in police custody may be admitted as evidence in trial only if the questioning was preceded by the Miranda Warming.
What happens if a suspect who is in custody isn’t given a Miranda warning and answers the police officer’s questions?
If a police officer questions the arrestee without giving the Miranda warning there is nothing the arrestee says can be used against the suspect in trial.
This is called the “exclusionary rule”. The purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter the police from violating the Miranda Rule.
Are there circumstances in which a statement by a suspect can’t be used against that suspect even if a Miranda warning is given?
Yes but only in unusual circumstances. For instance a confession following the giving of a Miranda warning cannot be used against a suspect if it’s the result of a “questioning first then a warning later”.
How do I assert my right to remain silent while I am being questioned by the police?
“I want to talk to an attorney”
“I refuse to speak with you”
“Please leave me alone”
“I don’t have anything to say”
“I claim my Miranda rights”
If the police questions me before arresting me, does the Miranda rule apply?
Miranda applies only to “custodial” questioning meaning that a person is not in custody unless a police officer has deprived a person of his/her freedom.
Posted on Vahe GTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales is really tough attorney and strong man. He never afraid of difficult cases and always fights like a knight. If you have some trouble in California, Mr. Morales' law firm really can help you.Posted on Jessy ATrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Chris Morales was very professional and kind. He made sure I understood every step and always took the time to answer my questions. I really appreciated his honesty and calm approach. I’m truly grateful for his help and would recommend him without hesitation.Posted on Jasmine STrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I really appreciate Christopher Morales for his professionalism and for taking the time to fully explain the answers to my questions. There's a lot that can be answered through his website, which I appreciate as well.Posted on Nazera FTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales is a very eloquent speaker with a great knowledge of the law and related matters. After I asked a few questions, he was able to answer them clearly and I felt supported by someone who had expertise in this field. I feel that he is passionate about his work and leads with that when representing his clients. I highly recommend getting in touch with him if you have questions or need support regarding criminal law.Posted on Shawn STrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I've had some interaction with Mr. Morales directly as I was doing research on his law firm and him specifically. He took the time to answer my questions thoughtfully and with candor. I was left with a very strong impression about his skills as an attorney and how he can best help his clients. I also asked a couple of indirect questions to get a sense of his views on law, policy, and society and was impressed with his answers and was left with a highly favorable view of the man. I would definitely be considering him and his firm for services that I need.Posted on Yen NTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales is highly professional, friendly, and takes time to answer questions patiently.Posted on Rebekah sTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales was prompt and informative with answering my questions. He gave me detailed information and left it open to ask more if needed.Posted on RenatoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Christopher Morales' most valuable trait is his straightforward honesty. He doesn't just tell you what you want to hear. Instead, he provides with a realistic legal perspective grounded in deep knowledge, ensuring you are well informed. I was also impressed how his firm leverages modern technology which makes the entire legal process more efficient, thus more affordable. For anyone needing a highly competent, modern, and direct attorney, I strongly recommend Christopher Morales.Posted on Claire MTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr Morales shows a great level of professionalism in his conversations and is approachable in personality. He was able to answer any questions I had and it was great to see his experience and knowledge reflected in the law firm website. I'm glad to have learned about his services.Posted on Karl bTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales was very knowledgeable and has answered all of my questions. Additionally, the website was full of very important information. I will be saving this website for future use. I am glad to have a place where I can run to if ever I need guidance with the law.