Domestic violence crimes are characterized by physical abuse and threats between two people who are in a close familial or social relationship. This article defines domestic violence, looks at common issues in criminal cases related to domestic violence incidents, and provides tips on stopping domestic violence.
What Is Domestic Violence?
Domestic violence is a catch-all term for violence that occurs between people who are related or who have a social relationship. They may be married, living together, or even just dating. They may be heterosexual, lesbian, or gay. While anyone can become a domestic violence perpetrator or victim, serious injuries resulting from domestic violence typically result from males attacking females. Though murder and rape can be forms of domestic violence, most often domestic violence consists of lesser forms of physical abuse such as slapping and pushing. Stalking can also be a form of domestic violence.
Is There a Crime Called “Domestic Violence”?
Many states define domestic violence as a distinct crime. As a result, a suspect who strikes a significant other may be charged with domestic violence instead of (or in addition to) other crimes such as assault and battery. Recognizing that domestic abusers take advantage of their victims’ trust and confidence, after a conviction for domestic violence prosecutors often push for sentences that are harsher than those that might be sought for assault-type crimes involving two strangers, and those sentences typically include special protections for past (and potential) targets of domestic abuse. For example, conviction of a crime of domestic violence may entail a mandatory jail sentence and some type of restraining order (more on this below). Also, since an abuser’s relationship with a victim may be a continuing one, identifying a crime as one of domestic violence allows judges to order abusers to participate in therapeutic counseling.
Here’s one example of a state that defines domestic violence as a distinct crime: In Wisconsin, “domestic violence” is defined as an offense committed by an adult against another adult that he or she lives with, has lived with, or shares a child with involving intentional infliction of pain, illness or injury, or intentional impairment of physical ability, or any type of sexual assault, or a physical act that would cause a reasonable person to fear for his or her safety.
Charging and Prosecuting Domestic Violence: Special Challenges
Police and prosecutors face two common problems when it comes to arresting, charging, and prosecuting domestic violence.
First, victims of domestic violence are often reluctant to report the abuse. Abuse victims may hope that the abuse was an isolated act that will not be repeated. Or they may be fearful that reporting the violence will only goad their attacker into further violence. If a woman and her children are dependent on their abuser’s income, the mother may fear that reporting the violence will result in loss of financial support. Understandable though such reactions may be, the result is that most crimes of domestic violence go unreported.
The second difficulty with prosecuting domestic violence cases is that even when victims of domestic violence report attacks to the police, victims often refuse to testify against their attackers at trial. As defendants have a constitutional right to confront and cross-examine their accusers, prosecutors usually cannot offer domestic violence victims’ statements to the police into evidence in lieu of the victims’ actual testimony in court. As a result, prosecutors must sometimes dismiss domestic violence charges. The combination of failing to report and refusing to cooperate with prosecutors makes domestic violence one of the hardest crimes to successfully prosecute.
Rules That Help Prosecutors Convict Domestic Violence Offenders
Some states (including California) have special rules for domestic violence cases that allow prosecutors to offer evidence that defendants charged with domestic violence have committed other acts of domestic violence. These rules are an exception to the general rule that prosecutors can’t offer evidence of defendants’ criminal history.
Also, if an abuser attacks or threatens a victim for the purpose of frightening the victim into refusing to testify at trial, the abuser waives (gives up) the right to confront and cross-examine the victim at trial, and police officers may testify as to the victim’s pretrial description of what happened.
Help for Domestic Violence Victims
Many localities have domestic violence hotlines. People who fear becoming victims of domestic violence should always know how to contact a domestic violence hotline. People who have been subjected to domestic violence may also go to court and secure a protective order or restraining order, which often prohibits the abuser from coming into contact with or even being in close proximity to (i.e. 500 feet) the domestic violence victim. An abuser who violates the terms of a restraining order (for example, by showing up at a victim’s home or place of work) may be arrested and charged with a crime. Since many domestic violence victims call 911 for assistance, it may help to know that statements made to 911 operators may be admissible in court to prove that a domestic abuser is guilty. Finally, a federal gun control law makes it a crime for people who have been convicted of crimes involving domestic violence to own guns.
If you need help with a domestic violence situation, the websites for these organizations are a good first step toward getting the assistance you need:
- National Domestic Violence Hotline (www.thehotline.org)
- National Coalition Against Domestic Violence (www.ncadv.org)
- Family Violence Prevention Fund
A Convicted Domestic Violence Offender Can’t Own a Gun
Since many domestic abusers are recidivists, Congress passed a law making it a federal crime for people convicted of domestic violence to own a gun (18 U.S.C. 922(g)(9)), hoping to reduce the injuries that repeat domestic violence offenders might inflict. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the law in the case of United States v. Hayes (2009), ruling that the law applied to any conviction based on an act of domestic violence, even if a defendant was not convicted explicitly of the crime of domestic violence.
The Morales Law Firm would like to thank NOLO for sharing this information with us.

Posted on Vahe GTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales is really tough attorney and strong man. He never afraid of difficult cases and always fights like a knight. If you have some trouble in California, Mr. Morales' law firm really can help you.Posted on Jessy ATrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Chris Morales was very professional and kind. He made sure I understood every step and always took the time to answer my questions. I really appreciated his honesty and calm approach. I’m truly grateful for his help and would recommend him without hesitation.Posted on Jasmine STrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I really appreciate Christopher Morales for his professionalism and for taking the time to fully explain the answers to my questions. There's a lot that can be answered through his website, which I appreciate as well.Posted on Nazera FTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales is a very eloquent speaker with a great knowledge of the law and related matters. After I asked a few questions, he was able to answer them clearly and I felt supported by someone who had expertise in this field. I feel that he is passionate about his work and leads with that when representing his clients. I highly recommend getting in touch with him if you have questions or need support regarding criminal law.Posted on Shawn STrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I've had some interaction with Mr. Morales directly as I was doing research on his law firm and him specifically. He took the time to answer my questions thoughtfully and with candor. I was left with a very strong impression about his skills as an attorney and how he can best help his clients. I also asked a couple of indirect questions to get a sense of his views on law, policy, and society and was impressed with his answers and was left with a highly favorable view of the man. I would definitely be considering him and his firm for services that I need.Posted on Yen NTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales is highly professional, friendly, and takes time to answer questions patiently.Posted on Rebekah sTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales was prompt and informative with answering my questions. He gave me detailed information and left it open to ask more if needed.Posted on RenatoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Christopher Morales' most valuable trait is his straightforward honesty. He doesn't just tell you what you want to hear. Instead, he provides with a realistic legal perspective grounded in deep knowledge, ensuring you are well informed. I was also impressed how his firm leverages modern technology which makes the entire legal process more efficient, thus more affordable. For anyone needing a highly competent, modern, and direct attorney, I strongly recommend Christopher Morales.Posted on Claire MTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr Morales shows a great level of professionalism in his conversations and is approachable in personality. He was able to answer any questions I had and it was great to see his experience and knowledge reflected in the law firm website. I'm glad to have learned about his services.Posted on Karl bTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales was very knowledgeable and has answered all of my questions. Additionally, the website was full of very important information. I will be saving this website for future use. I am glad to have a place where I can run to if ever I need guidance with the law.