A crime on one’s record can block eligibility for a visa or U.S. lawful permanent residence
If you are applying for a U.S. visa or for lawful permanent residence (a “green card”), the government officials reviewing your application will take steps to make sure that you are not “inadmissible” to the United States. If you are inadmissible, it means that you will be denied the green card or visa unless the law provides an opportunity for you to apply for legal forgiveness, called a “waiver,” and you successfully do so.
The grounds of inadmissibility are found in Section 212(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (I.N.A.). They include various crimes, along with other things like communicable diseases, past immigration violations, and the likelihood of needing government financial assistance.
Crimes, however, tend to present a major problem for many immigrants. Still, not every crime on a person’s record makes him or her inadmissible. This article discusses the ones that do.
Note that crimes on a person’s record are also a problem after an immigrant receives a U.S. visa or green card. However, these crimes are analyzed under a separate part of the immigration law, referred to as the grounds of “deportability.” Some overlap exists; anyone who has committed a serious or violent crime is likely to be both inadmissible and deportable.
Which Crimes Made the Statutory List
Here is a summary of the crimes or related activities that the I.N.A. lists as inadmissible. Note that not all of them require an actual conviction in court to make the applicant inadmissible. Do not rely on this list alone in assessing your immigration situation; get help from an experienced immigration attorney.
- Conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude (but not a purely political offense). This includes any attempt or conspiracy to commit such a crime. It excludes crimes committed when the person was under the age of 18 years, so long as the person was released from jail more than five years before applying for a visa or other immigration benefit. It also excludes crimes for which the maximum penalty did not exceed one year in prison and the person was not, in fact, sentenced to more than six months in prison.
- Conviction or admission of a controlled substance violation, whether under U.S. or foreign law. This includes any conspiracy to commit such a crime.
- Convictions for two or more crimes (other than purely political ones) for which the prison sentences totaled at least five years. This multiple-offense ground of inadmissibility applies whether or not the convictions came from a single trial and whether or not the offenses arose from a single scheme of misconduct or involved moral turpitude.
- Conviction of or participation in (according to the reasonable belief of the U.S. government) controlled substance trafficking. This includes anyone who knowingly aided, abetted, assisted, conspired, or colluded in illicit drug trafficking. It also includes the spouse, son, or daughter of the inadmissible applicant if that person has, within the last five years, received any financial or other benefit from the illicit activities, and knew or reasonably should have known where the money or benefit came from.
- Having the purpose of engaging in prostitution or commercialized vice upon coming to the United States, or a history, within the previous ten years, of having engaged in prostitution.
- Procurement or attempted procurement or importation of prostitutes, directly or indirectly, or receipt of proceeds of prostitution, any of which occurred within the previous ten years.
- Assertion of immunity from prosecution after committing a serious criminal offense in the U.S., if the person was thus able to depart the U.S. and has not since submitted fully to the jurisdiction of the relevant U.S. court .
- Commission of particularly severe violations of religious freedom while serving as a foreign government official.
- Commission of or conspiracy to commit human trafficking offenses, within or outside the U.S., or being a knowing aider, abettor, assister, conspirator, or colluder with such a trafficker according to the knowledge or reasonable belief of the U.S. government. Also inadmissible are the spouse, son, or daughter the applicant if they, within the previous five years (but when older than children), received financial or other benefits from the illicit activity and knew or reasonably should have known that the money or other benefit came from the illicit activity.
- Conviction of an aggravated felony, if the person was removed from the U.S. and seeks to return (this ground of inadmissibility lasts for 20 years)
- Seeking to enter the U.S. to engage in money laundering, or a history of having laundered money, or having been (according to the knowledge of the U.S. government) a knowing aider, abettor, assister, conspirator, or colluder with money launderers.
These are the straightforward crimes that are mentioned in the immigration law. The statute also lists a number of security violations, such as involvement in espionage, sabotage, terrorism, Nazi persecution, totalitarian parties, and so forth.
How Immigrants’ Crimes Are Discovered
Anytime someone applies for a visa or green card, they are asked to state whether they have ever been arrested for or convicted of a crime. Of course, some people lie on their applications—but in many cases the lies are discovered, because fingerprint checks are a requirement of most immigration applications. And once a person is caught in a lie, they become ineligible for virtually any U.S. immigration benefit in the future.
If you have a crime on your record, or see anything on the above list that makes you question your admissibility to the U.S., by all means consult with an experienced immigration attorney. It’s possible that you do not match the grounds of inadmissibility listed in the statute, or qualify for a waiver, but you would definitely need an attorney’s help in determining this or preparing the necessary waiver application.
Posted on Vahe GTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales is really tough attorney and strong man. He never afraid of difficult cases and always fights like a knight. If you have some trouble in California, Mr. Morales' law firm really can help you.Posted on Jessy ATrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Chris Morales was very professional and kind. He made sure I understood every step and always took the time to answer my questions. I really appreciated his honesty and calm approach. I’m truly grateful for his help and would recommend him without hesitation.Posted on Jasmine STrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I really appreciate Christopher Morales for his professionalism and for taking the time to fully explain the answers to my questions. There's a lot that can be answered through his website, which I appreciate as well.Posted on Nazera FTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales is a very eloquent speaker with a great knowledge of the law and related matters. After I asked a few questions, he was able to answer them clearly and I felt supported by someone who had expertise in this field. I feel that he is passionate about his work and leads with that when representing his clients. I highly recommend getting in touch with him if you have questions or need support regarding criminal law.Posted on Shawn STrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I've had some interaction with Mr. Morales directly as I was doing research on his law firm and him specifically. He took the time to answer my questions thoughtfully and with candor. I was left with a very strong impression about his skills as an attorney and how he can best help his clients. I also asked a couple of indirect questions to get a sense of his views on law, policy, and society and was impressed with his answers and was left with a highly favorable view of the man. I would definitely be considering him and his firm for services that I need.Posted on Yen NTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales is highly professional, friendly, and takes time to answer questions patiently.Posted on Rebekah sTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales was prompt and informative with answering my questions. He gave me detailed information and left it open to ask more if needed.Posted on RenatoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Christopher Morales' most valuable trait is his straightforward honesty. He doesn't just tell you what you want to hear. Instead, he provides with a realistic legal perspective grounded in deep knowledge, ensuring you are well informed. I was also impressed how his firm leverages modern technology which makes the entire legal process more efficient, thus more affordable. For anyone needing a highly competent, modern, and direct attorney, I strongly recommend Christopher Morales.Posted on Claire MTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr Morales shows a great level of professionalism in his conversations and is approachable in personality. He was able to answer any questions I had and it was great to see his experience and knowledge reflected in the law firm website. I'm glad to have learned about his services.Posted on Karl bTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales was very knowledgeable and has answered all of my questions. Additionally, the website was full of very important information. I will be saving this website for future use. I am glad to have a place where I can run to if ever I need guidance with the law.