In Sacramento, California about 30,000 of the inmates in California prisons refused meals for the second day in support of inmates held in solitary confinement at Pelican Bay State Prison, stated he correction official.
The meals were first refused on Monday then again on Tuesday. Inmates declared that the strike would be their third extended hunger strike in two years to protest the conditions many inmates face in solitary confinement. More than 4,500 gang members, gang associates and serious offenders are held in the security units where many of the inmates are kept in solitary confinement, sometimes for decades.
For a prison system that is already facing legal and logistical challenges a hunger strike brings more of a burden. Officials are currently struggling to move about 2,600 inmates from two Central Valley prisons because they are considered “vulnerable” to a potentially fatal airborne fungus. The prison has also appealed a separate court order requiring the state to release nearly 10,000 inmates by year’s end to reduce prison crowding in order to improve conditions for sick and mentally ill inmates.
The isolation units that are the focus of the hunger strike are at Pelican Bay near the Oregon border and at three other maximum security prisons around the state. Inmates refused breakfast and lunch at two-thirds of the state’s 33 prisons and at all 4 private prisons that hold California inmates in other states explained Terry Thornton, a spokeswoman for the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. It is still unsure how many inmates skipped dinners.
Inmates as well have refused to go about their day, on Monday about 2,300 inmates statewide refused to go to their jobs or classes, then on Tuesday the number went down to 2,000 inmates. The number of inmates refusing meals has slowly gone done, from 30,000 on Monday to 29,000 on Tuesday.
About two years ago, the number of participates cause two hunger strikes. About 12,000 inmates missed at least some meals in October 2011, and nearly 7,000 declined meals in July 2011. Officials said many inmates began to eat again after several days had passed.
Pelican Bay inmates said through advocacy groups that the protest began after talks with prison officials broke down last month over inmates’ demands that the department end long term solitary confinement. Thornton mentioned that the department changed its policies last year to give gang associates a way out of the units. About half of the nearly 400 inmates considered so far have been or will be let out of solitary confinement, while another 115 are in a program in which they can work their way out of the units.
This past April, a federal judge refused to dismiss a lawsuit filed by 10 Pelican Bay inmates alleging their living condition in the isolation units are unconstitutionally cruel and unusual punishment.
In the mean time 12 inmates at High Desert State Prison near Susanville continued a separate hunger strike they began July 1, to protest conditions in the administrative segregation unit there. Twenty-three inmates have refused meals at the prison 185 miles northeast of Sacramento, but about half have resumed eating.
The Prisoner Hunger Stike Solidarity Coalition is planning protests in solidarity with the inmates. About 75 people rallied in solidarity in downtown LA on Monday, and about a dozen of demonstrators gathered in front of the King County Jail in Seattle.
Prisoner demands call for state officials to:
-stop punishing groups for the actions of individuals
-stop rewarding those who provide information on others
-improve nutrition
-institute constructive programs for those in solitary confinement
-end long-term solitary confinement
The California prison system currently holds over 10,000 prisoners in solitary confinement units, with dozens having spent more than 20 years in insolation, according to the Prisoner Hunger Strike Solidarity Coalition.
Posted on Vahe GTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales is really tough attorney and strong man. He never afraid of difficult cases and always fights like a knight. If you have some trouble in California, Mr. Morales' law firm really can help you.Posted on Jessy ATrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Chris Morales was very professional and kind. He made sure I understood every step and always took the time to answer my questions. I really appreciated his honesty and calm approach. I’m truly grateful for his help and would recommend him without hesitation.Posted on Jasmine STrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I really appreciate Christopher Morales for his professionalism and for taking the time to fully explain the answers to my questions. There's a lot that can be answered through his website, which I appreciate as well.Posted on Nazera FTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales is a very eloquent speaker with a great knowledge of the law and related matters. After I asked a few questions, he was able to answer them clearly and I felt supported by someone who had expertise in this field. I feel that he is passionate about his work and leads with that when representing his clients. I highly recommend getting in touch with him if you have questions or need support regarding criminal law.Posted on Shawn STrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I've had some interaction with Mr. Morales directly as I was doing research on his law firm and him specifically. He took the time to answer my questions thoughtfully and with candor. I was left with a very strong impression about his skills as an attorney and how he can best help his clients. I also asked a couple of indirect questions to get a sense of his views on law, policy, and society and was impressed with his answers and was left with a highly favorable view of the man. I would definitely be considering him and his firm for services that I need.Posted on Yen NTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales is highly professional, friendly, and takes time to answer questions patiently.Posted on Rebekah sTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales was prompt and informative with answering my questions. He gave me detailed information and left it open to ask more if needed.Posted on RenatoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Christopher Morales' most valuable trait is his straightforward honesty. He doesn't just tell you what you want to hear. Instead, he provides with a realistic legal perspective grounded in deep knowledge, ensuring you are well informed. I was also impressed how his firm leverages modern technology which makes the entire legal process more efficient, thus more affordable. For anyone needing a highly competent, modern, and direct attorney, I strongly recommend Christopher Morales.Posted on Claire MTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr Morales shows a great level of professionalism in his conversations and is approachable in personality. He was able to answer any questions I had and it was great to see his experience and knowledge reflected in the law firm website. I'm glad to have learned about his services.Posted on Karl bTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales was very knowledgeable and has answered all of my questions. Additionally, the website was full of very important information. I will be saving this website for future use. I am glad to have a place where I can run to if ever I need guidance with the law.