By Janet Portman, Attorney
If you’ve successfully expunged, or sealed, your criminal record, in most situations you can answer “No” when asked whether you have a record. But what happens when someone—a potential employer, or a prosecutor, for example—asks that any records pertaining to you be disclosed to them? Will the court (or the clerk in the records office) always say “No record,” in spite of the order of expungement? That depends on the law in your state and who’s doing the asking.
Below are common examples of when your sealed or expunged record will come to light.
Asking to Seal Your Record Again
Many states that allow convicted defendants to expunge their records offer the remedy only once. After that, records of criminal convictions cannot be sealed. Logically, in order to determine whether your current request to seal a record is your first, a court will need to look through its files to see whether you’ve done this already, so your “expunged record” will be accessible for this purpose.
Subsequent Brushes With the Law
Many offenses become more serious when the defendant has a prior conviction on his record, for that offense or for another one. For example, petty theft (theft of property worth less than a specified amount, often $500) is usually charged as a misdemeanor when it’s the defendant’s first such charge. But if the defendant has a petty theft conviction on his record, he can be charged with “petty with a prior,” which can elevate the offense to a felony.
Clearly, in order to know whether “petty with a prior” is an appropriate charge, a prosecutor needs access to the defendant’s criminal record. In this situation, even an expunged petty theft conviction will be accessible to the prosecutor, and usable to substantiate the heftier subsequent charge.
Use at Sentencing
If you get into trouble with the law again, you may find yourself facing sentencing. Many times, sentences will be increased for repeat offenders. Much as a prosecutor can gain access to your record to determine whether an enhanced charge is appropriate, so too can a prosecutor and judge consider “expunged” records when asking for and choosing a sentence for a subsequent conviction. Prior convictions can also eliminate the option for “diversion” (counseling in place of a trial) or probation. Felony priors that count as “strikes” in a state’s Three Strikes sentencing scheme will never go away, even if expunged (which is rare).
Working for the Government
Many states, and the federal government, allow disclosure of an expunged record in limited situations in which the public good is balanced against the individual’s expectation that the expunged record will remain off-limits. For example, records might become available during background screening for government positions, such as court administrative jobs; or positions with a juvenile court or agency delivering juvenile services. Sealed records might be available to law enforcement in the course of their investigation of a possible crime, and to agencies that review handgun license applications.
Working in Sensitive Professions or Occupations
In some states, individuals who want to work as public school teachers, corrections guards, or police officers should expect that their employers will have access to expunged records. Agencies reviewing applications for professional licenses, including law, pharmacy, or medicine, may also have access.
Using a Witness’ Record Against Him in Court
When someone testifies at a trial or other court proceeding, the opposition often tries to discredit the witness by bringing up unsavory, but relevant, aspects of his or her past. Historically, if a witness had any felony convictions, the jury could be told, on the theory that anyone who had broken the law so seriously might not be an honest witness.
Modern rules from state to state limit the types of felonies that can be disclosed, but generally speaking, those that reflect on a person’s honesty (known as “moral turpitude convictions) are often fair game—even when the conviction has been expunged.
Expunged Records and Civil Cases
Sometimes expunged records become relevant in civil cases, such as libel. For example, suppose a newspaper reports on a citizen’s prior conviction for a crime. If that conviction had been expunged, can the citizen bring a libel action against the newspaper? Courts have answered this question differently; those that have not allowed a libel suit to prevail have relied on the established defense that the truth of the statement will defeat a libel suit. Sometimes, the court that hears the libel case is the same one that ordered the plaintiff’s record expunged. These courts are in the interesting position of having first expunged a conviction (decreeing that it never occurred), then ruling that a recitation of the event is the truth.
Posted on Vahe GTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales is really tough attorney and strong man. He never afraid of difficult cases and always fights like a knight. If you have some trouble in California, Mr. Morales' law firm really can help you.Posted on Jessy ATrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Chris Morales was very professional and kind. He made sure I understood every step and always took the time to answer my questions. I really appreciated his honesty and calm approach. I’m truly grateful for his help and would recommend him without hesitation.Posted on Jasmine STrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I really appreciate Christopher Morales for his professionalism and for taking the time to fully explain the answers to my questions. There's a lot that can be answered through his website, which I appreciate as well.Posted on Nazera FTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales is a very eloquent speaker with a great knowledge of the law and related matters. After I asked a few questions, he was able to answer them clearly and I felt supported by someone who had expertise in this field. I feel that he is passionate about his work and leads with that when representing his clients. I highly recommend getting in touch with him if you have questions or need support regarding criminal law.Posted on Shawn STrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I've had some interaction with Mr. Morales directly as I was doing research on his law firm and him specifically. He took the time to answer my questions thoughtfully and with candor. I was left with a very strong impression about his skills as an attorney and how he can best help his clients. I also asked a couple of indirect questions to get a sense of his views on law, policy, and society and was impressed with his answers and was left with a highly favorable view of the man. I would definitely be considering him and his firm for services that I need.Posted on Yen NTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales is highly professional, friendly, and takes time to answer questions patiently.Posted on Rebekah sTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales was prompt and informative with answering my questions. He gave me detailed information and left it open to ask more if needed.Posted on RenatoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Christopher Morales' most valuable trait is his straightforward honesty. He doesn't just tell you what you want to hear. Instead, he provides with a realistic legal perspective grounded in deep knowledge, ensuring you are well informed. I was also impressed how his firm leverages modern technology which makes the entire legal process more efficient, thus more affordable. For anyone needing a highly competent, modern, and direct attorney, I strongly recommend Christopher Morales.Posted on Claire MTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr Morales shows a great level of professionalism in his conversations and is approachable in personality. He was able to answer any questions I had and it was great to see his experience and knowledge reflected in the law firm website. I'm glad to have learned about his services.Posted on Karl bTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales was very knowledgeable and has answered all of my questions. Additionally, the website was full of very important information. I will be saving this website for future use. I am glad to have a place where I can run to if ever I need guidance with the law.