How much will a lawyer cost? Here are the various ways that private criminal lawyers charge for their work.
By Sara J. Berman
One of the first questions you’re likely to ask an attorney whom you’re considering hiring is, “What will this cost?” Here’s the low-down on how criminal defense attorneys charge for their services, which vary according to such factors as:
The probable complexity of the case. Most attorneys charge more for felonies than for misdemeanors, because felonies carry greater penalties, often require more court appearances, demand more preparation, and so on.
The attorney’s experience. Generally, less experienced attorneys set lower fees than their more experienced colleagues. But beware when you encounter an extremely low hourly rate (see below), which can be misleading. An experienced attorney with a high hourly rate may be able to resolve a case more quickly and satisfactorily than a novice with a much lower hourly rate, and therefore be less expensive in the long run.
Geography. Just as gasoline and butter cost more in some parts of the country than others, so do attorneys.
Because of factors such as these, standard legal fees do not exist. According to a survey of readers reported in Consumer Reports, the median legal fee charged by lawyers in criminal cases was $1,500. (Median means that the fees were over the amount in as many cases as they were under the amount.) Because many of these cases involved only a consultation or a single court appearance, most defendants can expect to pay much more for full representation. For example, a defendant charged with a misdemeanor that goes to trial should not be surprised by a legal fee in the neighborhood of $2,000–$3,000; an attorney may want an advance of around $2,500, and $1,000 per day of trial in a felony case. Moreover, most attorneys want all or a substantial portion of their fees paid up front (in advance).
Hourly Billing
Defendants who are billed by the hour pay for the actual time their lawyers devote to their cases—say, $150 per hour. They may also pay for expenses a lawyer incurs in the course of the representation, such as copying fees, subpoena fees, and so on. From the defendant’s standpoint there are advantages and disadvantages to hourly billing.
- Advantage. Defendants who pay by the hour benefit if a case concludes quickly.
- Disadvantage. If the case becomes unexpectedly complicated, it can get very costly. Moreover, hourly fees give attorneys a financial incentive to devote more time to a case than it may warrant or the defendant is prepared to pay. Also, most criminal defense attorneys set a minimum retainer fee that they keep even if a case is resolved with one phone call.
Fortunately, experienced defense attorneys usually can anticipate how many hours they are likely to spend on a case, and a defendant should not agree to an hourly charge without getting the attorney’s good-faith estimate of how much time the case is likely to take.
Case Billing
Lawyers who charge by the case represent defendants for a fixed fee. For example, a lawyer may set a fee of $1,500 for a defendant charged with drunk driving. The fee would not change, regardless of the number of hours the lawyer devotes to the case. As with hourly billing, the case billing approach has its advantages and disadvantages.
Primary advantage: Certainty. Defendants know going in what their cost will be, and the attorney bears the risk of unforeseen complications.
Disadvantage: Feeling that you overpaid, or having to pay for trial. With a case billing set-up, a defendant may feel ripped off if the case settles very quickly. (In some quick settlement circumstances, attorneys will refund a portion of their fee. But many will not, and a client should not expect a refund if the case is resolved quickly.) Also, the fee may cover only the pretrial phase of the case; the attorney may require an additional substantial fee to actually try the case.
As with other types of information, the defendant should clarify these points before hiring the attorney A defendant may also agree to pay an hourly fee but only up to an agreed-upon fixed sum. After that amount, the lawyer finishes the representation at no extra cost to a defendant. This approach combines the advantage of paying by the hour while minimizing the disadvantages.
Retainers
Whether they bill by the hour or by the case, defense lawyers typically want defendants to pay a retainer fee up front, before the attorney begins working on the case. For example, a lawyer who bills at the rate of $100 an hour may want clients to pay up front for 20 hours of the lawyer’s time, or $2,000. The lawyer should send the client regular statements showing how much time the lawyer has spent on the case, what was done, and how much of the retainer has thus far been used. If the balance in a defendant’s account approaches zero, the lawyer will probably ask the defendant for an additional payment (unless the lawyer is working for a set fee).
Posted on Vahe GTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales is really tough attorney and strong man. He never afraid of difficult cases and always fights like a knight. If you have some trouble in California, Mr. Morales' law firm really can help you.Posted on Jessy ATrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Chris Morales was very professional and kind. He made sure I understood every step and always took the time to answer my questions. I really appreciated his honesty and calm approach. I’m truly grateful for his help and would recommend him without hesitation.Posted on Jasmine STrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I really appreciate Christopher Morales for his professionalism and for taking the time to fully explain the answers to my questions. There's a lot that can be answered through his website, which I appreciate as well.Posted on Nazera FTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales is a very eloquent speaker with a great knowledge of the law and related matters. After I asked a few questions, he was able to answer them clearly and I felt supported by someone who had expertise in this field. I feel that he is passionate about his work and leads with that when representing his clients. I highly recommend getting in touch with him if you have questions or need support regarding criminal law.Posted on Shawn STrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I've had some interaction with Mr. Morales directly as I was doing research on his law firm and him specifically. He took the time to answer my questions thoughtfully and with candor. I was left with a very strong impression about his skills as an attorney and how he can best help his clients. I also asked a couple of indirect questions to get a sense of his views on law, policy, and society and was impressed with his answers and was left with a highly favorable view of the man. I would definitely be considering him and his firm for services that I need.Posted on Yen NTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales is highly professional, friendly, and takes time to answer questions patiently.Posted on Rebekah sTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales was prompt and informative with answering my questions. He gave me detailed information and left it open to ask more if needed.Posted on RenatoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Christopher Morales' most valuable trait is his straightforward honesty. He doesn't just tell you what you want to hear. Instead, he provides with a realistic legal perspective grounded in deep knowledge, ensuring you are well informed. I was also impressed how his firm leverages modern technology which makes the entire legal process more efficient, thus more affordable. For anyone needing a highly competent, modern, and direct attorney, I strongly recommend Christopher Morales.Posted on Claire MTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr Morales shows a great level of professionalism in his conversations and is approachable in personality. He was able to answer any questions I had and it was great to see his experience and knowledge reflected in the law firm website. I'm glad to have learned about his services.Posted on Karl bTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr. Morales was very knowledgeable and has answered all of my questions. Additionally, the website was full of very important information. I will be saving this website for future use. I am glad to have a place where I can run to if ever I need guidance with the law.